Dear Albert Aribaud,
On 16.08.12 20:22, Markus Hubig wrote:
> The board_postclk_init() function can be used to perform operations
> that requires a working timer early within the U-Boot init_sequence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig <mhu...@imko.de>
> Cc: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net>
> ---
> arch/arm/lib/board.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> index f1951e8..109a1ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> @@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ init_fnc_t *init_sequence[] = {
> fdtdec_check_fdt,
> #endif
> timer_init, /* initialize timer */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BOARD_POSTCLK_INIT
> + board_postclk_init,
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC
> get_clocks,
> #endif
>
how do you think about this suggestion? Will you accept it? Should I
apply both patches to u-boot-atmel?
Best regards
Andreas Bießmann
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
