Hi Andreas, On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:17:58 +0200, Andreas Bießmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Albert Aribaud, > > On 16.08.12 20:22, Markus Hubig wrote: > > The board_postclk_init() function can be used to perform operations > > that requires a working timer early within the U-Boot init_sequence. > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig <[email protected]> > > Cc: Albert ARIBAUD <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/arm/lib/board.c | 3 +++ > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/lib/board.c > > index f1951e8..109a1ac 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c > > @@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ init_fnc_t *init_sequence[] = { > > fdtdec_check_fdt, > > #endif > > timer_init, /* initialize timer */ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_BOARD_POSTCLK_INIT > > + board_postclk_init, > > +#endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC > > get_clocks, > > #endif > > > > how do you think about this suggestion? Will you accept it? Should I > apply both patches to u-boot-atmel? From what I see, this converges with what's been in PPC for a long time... I'm ok with the series going into atmel. > Best regards > > Andreas Bießmann Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
