Hi Marek, On 02/14/2012 01:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> Hi, Wolfgang, >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] >>> On Behalf Of Wolfgang Grandegger >>> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 8:08 PM >>> To: U-Boot >>> Subject: [U-Boot] mx6: consolidating and extending anadig/analog/anatop >>> register defs >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> for the USB support on MX6Q, I'm trying to consolidate and extend the >>> register definitions for the ANADIG registers. Unfortunately, three >>> different names are used for the same registers: ANADIG, analog and >>> ANATOP. Any idea what the names do stand for and what would be the most >>> appropriate one. Apart from that, we should have a separate structure and >>> header file for these registers. Currently, they are added to the CCM >>> regs. >> >> The register definition in the CCM according to the RM as followings: >> Addresses: CCM_analog_PLL_SYS is 0h base + 0h offset = 0000_0000h >> CCM_analog_PLL_SYS_SET is 0h base + 4h offset = 0000_0004h >> CCM_analog_PLL_SYS_CLR is 0h base + 8h offset = 0000_0008h >> CCM_analog_PLL_SYS_TOG is 0h base + Ch offset = 0000_000Ch >> >> Thus, I put the register definition into the CCM parts. > > This again resembles MX28 ... damn, can't we share some parts of MX28 for > MX6Q ? > > Fabio, I think I'll need one too, this is getting weird ;-)
Unfortunately, I did not get hold of a RM yet :(. It's still under NDA, I believe. Therefore I will postpone my "consolidation" activities for the time being. The USB support patch I sent does work, as Dirk confirmed, and therefore I suggest to apply it as intermediate solution. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
