> Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <201111052306.23919.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > Well you put out quite a good reason in the other mail for uImage. Now > > the problem basically is the negotiation between linux and uboot as of > > who has to wrap the image into what envelope. I don't see this happening > > actually, which sucks. > > Look at the PPC code. There we have a plain simple uImage make target > in Linux, and everything is fine. In ARM, we only have a target which > gives us a pre-wrapped image, i. e. which always includes the kernel's > wrapper and decompressor. How can we change this? Patches are not > accepted. > > > > What exactly _is_ the problem of uImage? > > > > The exact problem here is it loads the kernel to fixed address. > > This has been addressed, and patches are queued. >
I went through the previous discussions, sorry for the noise. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
