> Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <201111051941.38920.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > this patchset is good and all, but can we not also introduce cmd_zload to > > load zImages? Wolfgang, today's ARM hardware will really benefit from > > that, uImage holds us back a lot these days. Other option is to extend > > cmd_bootm() to load zImages. > > uImage holds us back? And hardware will benefit from that?
Well you put out quite a good reason in the other mail for uImage. Now the problem basically is the negotiation between linux and uboot as of who has to wrap the image into what envelope. I don't see this happening actually, which sucks. > > I can't parse that. Could you please elucidate? > > What exactly _is_ the problem of uImage? The exact problem here is it loads the kernel to fixed address. > > Or have you ever considered using a FIT image? That looks good, yes. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
