> Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <201111052141.27086.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > I'd be more open to adding some kind of a flag to uImage, rather than > > using address 0xffffffff. For this is quite fragile and seems a lot like > > a hack. > > We don't want to have 0xffffffff. > > The agreement was to support relative imagaes. > > See > 10/18 Stephen Warren [PATCH v2 REPOST 1/3] [COSMETIC] checkpatch > whitespace cleanups > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/113093 > 10/18 Stephen Warren [PATCH v2 REPOST 2/3] image: Implement > IH_TYPE_KERNEL_REL > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/113079 > 10/18 Stephen Warren [PATCH v2 REPOST 3/3] tegra2: Enable > CONFIG_SYS_RELATIVE_IMAGES > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/113080 > > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk
Ok I see, I definitelly missed those. Thanks _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
