> Dear Marek Vasut,
> 
> In message <201111052141.27086.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> > I'd be more open to adding some kind of a flag to uImage, rather than
> > using address 0xffffffff. For this is quite fragile and seems a lot like
> > a hack.
> 
> We don't want to have 0xffffffff.
> 
> The agreement was to support relative imagaes.
> 
> See
> 10/18 Stephen Warren     [PATCH v2 REPOST 1/3] [COSMETIC] checkpatch
> whitespace cleanups
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/113093
> 10/18 Stephen Warren     [PATCH v2 REPOST 2/3] image: Implement
> IH_TYPE_KERNEL_REL
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/113079
> 10/18 Stephen Warren     [PATCH v2 REPOST 3/3] tegra2: Enable
> CONFIG_SYS_RELATIVE_IMAGES
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/113080
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk

Ok I see, I definitelly missed those. Thanks
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to