On Wednesday 12 October 2011 15:29:34 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > I don't have this patch on my list. My interpretation was we skip it? > > > > it's dead/inconsistent code (as i showed), and i don't think using it > > gains us anything. for the few edge cases where arches/boards are > > adding custom targets to the top level "clean" target, i think that > > better solved by moving to a kbuild style system where the targets are > > defined in the subdirs and the top level clean target simply removes the > > summation of all those variables. > > Is the patch still OK, or is rebasing needed?
i'll check tonight to see if more boards were added since i last posted -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
