Dear Mike Frysinger,

In message <201110121515.59543.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > I don't have this patch on my list. My interpretation was we skip it?
>
> it's dead/inconsistent code (as i showed), and i don't think using it gains 
> us 
> anything.  for the few edge cases where arches/boards are adding custom 
> targets to the top level "clean" target, i think that better solved by moving 
> to a kbuild style system where the targets are defined in the subdirs and the 
> top level clean target simply removes the summation of all those variables.

Is the patch still OK, or is rebasing needed?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
Very ugly or very beautiful women should be flattered on their
understanding, and mediocre ones on their beauty.
                                       -- Philip Earl of Chesterfield
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to