On Wednesday 12 October 2011 14:38:18 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > i've posted a big patch to do that already, but it hasn't yet been > > > > merged -mike > > > > > > I found it at: > > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-September/101648.html > > > > > > It's unclear from the discussion there if the patch was accepted and is > > > simply waiting to be merged, or if it was rejected. I'm a little > > > hesitant to apply the same patch to the new Ventana board file it the > > > linked patch isn't actually going to be accepted. Can you comment on > > > this? > > > > obviously i think it's just a matter of time ;). important point being > > that there are boards already without these targets and they build/clean > > just fine since these sub-targets never get used. > > I don't have this patch on my list. My interpretation was we skip it?
it's dead/inconsistent code (as i showed), and i don't think using it gains us anything. for the few edge cases where arches/boards are adding custom targets to the top level "clean" target, i think that better solved by moving to a kbuild style system where the targets are defined in the subdirs and the top level clean target simply removes the summation of all those variables. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
