On Wednesday 12 October 2011 14:38:18 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > i've posted a big patch to do that already, but it hasn't yet been
> > > > merged -mike
> > > 
> > > I found it at:
> > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-September/101648.html
> > > 
> > > It's unclear from the discussion there if the patch was accepted and is
> > > simply waiting to be merged, or if it was rejected. I'm a little
> > > hesitant to apply the same patch to the new Ventana board file it the
> > > linked patch isn't actually going to be accepted. Can you comment on
> > > this?
> > 
> > obviously i think it's just a matter of time ;).  important point being
> > that there are boards already without these targets and they build/clean
> > just fine since these sub-targets never get used.
> 
> I don't have this patch on my list. My interpretation was we skip it?

it's dead/inconsistent code (as i showed), and i don't think using it gains us 
anything.  for the few edge cases where arches/boards are adding custom 
targets to the top level "clean" target, i think that better solved by moving 
to a kbuild style system where the targets are defined in the subdirs and the 
top level clean target simply removes the summation of all those variables.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to