Dear Aneesh V,

In message <4e170601.1080...@ti.com> you wrote:
>
> Symlinks, copies are not involved in either case. My question was this:
> Where should something like 'nand_spl/nand_boot.c' go in the new
> framework?
> 
> 1) spl/nand/nand_boot.c OR
> 2) drivers/nand/spl_nand_boot.c

I have no strong preferences here...

> (2) Helps in having:
> SPLOBJTREE := (OBJTREE)/spl
> 
> where as with (1) we have:
> SPLOBJTREE := (OBJTREE)/spl/obj
> and with this nand_boot.o will be in
> (OBJTREE)/spl/obj/spl/nand/nand_boot.o !
> 
> To me (2) looks cleaner, and goes well with the idea of having all
> source files in the original source tree.

Agreed.  But maybe we can remove a redundant "nand" from the file
name, like this:

        drivers/nand/spl_boot.c

?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
"Faith: not *wanting* to know what is true."    - Friedrich Nietzsche
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to