Dear Aneesh V, In message <4e170601.1080...@ti.com> you wrote: > > Symlinks, copies are not involved in either case. My question was this: > Where should something like 'nand_spl/nand_boot.c' go in the new > framework? > > 1) spl/nand/nand_boot.c OR > 2) drivers/nand/spl_nand_boot.c
I have no strong preferences here... > (2) Helps in having: > SPLOBJTREE := (OBJTREE)/spl > > where as with (1) we have: > SPLOBJTREE := (OBJTREE)/spl/obj > and with this nand_boot.o will be in > (OBJTREE)/spl/obj/spl/nand/nand_boot.o ! > > To me (2) looks cleaner, and goes well with the idea of having all > source files in the original source tree. Agreed. But maybe we can remove a redundant "nand" from the file name, like this: drivers/nand/spl_boot.c ? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "Faith: not *wanting* to know what is true." - Friedrich Nietzsche _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot