Hi Nikhil, On 17/01/23 18:49, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:09:00AM +0530, Nikhl M Jain wrote: >> Hi, Tom >> >> On 13/01/23 20:13, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 01:59:21PM +0530, Nikhil M Jain wrote: >>> >>>> Add device tree node which includes the register >>>> regions to write properties of planes (vidl1 and vid1), >>>> overlays (ovr1 and ovr2),and video ports(vp1 and vp2). >>>> TIDSS uses 3 clocks, fck- for its internal logic and >>>> clk vp1 and vp2 for oldi and HDMI ports. >>>> >>>> To control the oldi panel its register region is added >>>> in dss_oldi_io_ctrl. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nikhil M Jain <n-ja...@ti.com> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/dts/k3-am62-main.dtsi | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) >>> >>> Can we not get this with a re-sync of the dts upstream? We should do >>> that instead. >>> >> On linux side pathces have been sent upstream, waiting for patches to be >> accepted. >> >> link: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220505134303.23208-2-a-bhat...@ti.com/T/ >> >> Is it possible to accept these patches now and resync the dts when the >> patches on the linux side gets accepted. > > Based on the link you give here, they haven't been accepted, they've had > changes requested: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220505134303.23208-2-a-bhat...@ti.com/T/#mcf7eb2921982735440f2b0959feb3831530a2f05 >
Please wait for the kernel bindings to settle down. Else we will end up with different sets of bindings for kernel and u-boot. I don't see why DSS should be exempted from the rule that kernel bindings and DT being accepted. -- Regards Vignesh
