Dear Stefano Babic, In message <1286875504-9058-2-git-send-email-sba...@denx.de> you wrote: > The patch adds the linux framebuffer header file. As several > drivers are ported from Linux, it is easier to reuse the same > structures already present in the kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> > --- > include/linux/fb.h | 616 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 616 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 include/linux/fb.h
Please include an indication where exactly the code is coming from, as described in the Linux kernel's "SubmittingPatches" document: | Special note to back-porters: It seems to be a common and useful practise | to insert an indication of the origin of a patch at the top of the commit | message (just after the subject line) to facilitate tracking. For instance, | here's what we see in 2.6-stable : | | Date: Tue May 13 19:10:30 2008 +0000 | | SCSI: libiscsi regression in 2.6.25: fix nop timer handling | | commit 4cf1043593db6a337f10e006c23c69e5fc93e722 upstream | | And here's what appears in 2.4 : | | Date: Tue May 13 22:12:27 2008 +0200 | | wireless, airo: waitbusy() won't delay | | [backport of 2.6 commit b7acbdfbd1f277c1eb23f344f899cfa4cd0bf36a] | | Whatever the format, this information provides a valuable help to people | tracking your trees, and to people trying to trouble-shoot bugs in your | tree. So please include at least the name of the file in the Linux tree and the exact kenrel version used as a reference in the commit message. Thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "Just think, with VLSI we can have 100 ENIACS on a chip!" - Alan Perlis _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
