On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: >> >> > Looking at the code I wonder why we need post_word_store() and >> > post_word_load() functions at all. All implementations I have found >> > translate into a single ioread32() resp. iowrite32() call. >> > >> Probably, due to big and little endians that the PPC code should >> support. On other hand, AFAIK, no one is really using a little endian >> notation on PPC platforms in u-boot. I am not sure however, is this a >> good enough reason to omit such support? Or am I missing something? > > We don;t indterface to any specific device register here, so the > actual byte order used when writing and reading the data does not > matter at all (as long as writer and reader agree). I see no reason > why we should not simply use the respective accessor macro for this > architecture. > Ah, of course, that's correct.
Thanks, Michael _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
