On 11/22/2018 02:28 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:24:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 11/22/2018 01:52 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:56 Uhr schrieb Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>> This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_BLK by the deadline.
>>>>> Remove it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As the board is still mainted I will NAK it for the moment. Are there
>>>> any hints want needs to be done
>>>> to port thie board over to new DM stuff?
>>>
>>> Yes, as a start you need to switch over to using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL and
>>> selecting/providing a dtb file.  I see ot1200 is using DWC_AHSATA which
>>> needs more work, but this is the board-level work that needs doing.
>>
>> Wasn't there a possibility to use platform data in board file instead of
>> DT ? Or is DT mandatory now , including the libfdt overhead ?
> 
> In short, DT for U-Boot and platform data for SPL is what's recommended,
> yes.

If the board is limited, can it use only platdata ? Some platforms don't
even have DT support at all.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to