On 11/22/2018 02:28 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:24:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 11/22/2018 01:52 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote: >>> >>>> Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:56 Uhr schrieb Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>: >>>>> >>>>> This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_BLK by the deadline. >>>>> Remove it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> As the board is still mainted I will NAK it for the moment. Are there >>>> any hints want needs to be done >>>> to port thie board over to new DM stuff? >>> >>> Yes, as a start you need to switch over to using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL and >>> selecting/providing a dtb file. I see ot1200 is using DWC_AHSATA which >>> needs more work, but this is the board-level work that needs doing. >> >> Wasn't there a possibility to use platform data in board file instead of >> DT ? Or is DT mandatory now , including the libfdt overhead ? > > In short, DT for U-Boot and platform data for SPL is what's recommended, > yes.
If the board is limited, can it use only platdata ? Some platforms don't even have DT support at all. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot