Am Do., 22. Nov. 2018, 14:44 hat Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> geschrieben:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:24:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On 11/22/2018 01:52 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote: > > > > > >> Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:56 Uhr schrieb Simon Glass < > s...@chromium.org>: > > >>> > > >>> This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_BLK by the deadline. > > >>> Remove it. > > >>> > > >> > > >> As the board is still mainted I will NAK it for the moment. Are there > > >> any hints want needs to be done > > >> to port thie board over to new DM stuff? > > > > > > Yes, as a start you need to switch over to using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL and > > > selecting/providing a dtb file. I see ot1200 is using DWC_AHSATA which > > > needs more work, but this is the board-level work that needs doing. > > > > Wasn't there a possibility to use platform data in board file instead of > > DT ? Or is DT mandatory now , including the libfdt overhead ? > > In short, DT for U-Boot and platform data for SPL is what's recommended, > yes. > This is a little confusing for me. Socfpga gen5 SPL doesn't do that. And it seems a little strange or outdated overall. Would there be some kind of reference architecture or mach to look at what's the suggested/up-to-date way to implement SPL? Also regarding code flow? Simon > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
