On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/05/17 12:50, Andreas Färber wrote: > > Hej Patrick, > > > > Am 09.05.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Patrick Wildt: > >> The NanoPi Neo2 is basically the same as the NanoPi Neo, but that they > >> replaced the SoC with the 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC. Add a (64-bit only) > >> defconfig defining the required options to build the U-Boot proper. > >> > >> Create a new .dts file for it by including the (32-bit) H3 SoC .dtsi > >> and changing the differing components accordingly, like it's been > >> done for the OrangePi PC 2. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Patrick Wildt <patr...@blueri.se> > > > > I've tested this patch on top of yesterday's master branch > > (4c78028737c3185f49f5691183aeac3478b5f699 "mksunxi_fit_atf.sh: Allow for > > this to complete when bl31.bin is missing"). > > > > Considering Tom's unanswered question, is there any diff to the upstream > > kernel .dts? Expected would be to just copy the Linux .dts file here and > > to state which tree and commit/tag it was taken from. > > I think we have a similar diversion between Linux and U-Boot .dts here, > given that the U-Boot support was merged earlier. > Updating the DTs for H5 and the board(s) was on my plan, but it's a bit > more involved since it affects the H3 .dts as well (H3 and H5 use a > shared stub .dtsi now). Also the H5 .dtsi just got into Linux > (4.12-rc1), so it hasn't been in an officially released kernel yet.
I'm fine with re-syncing to v4.12-rc2, btw. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
