On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:59:35PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:56:09PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 08:27:02PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > Am 01.06.2017 um 16:04 schrieb Patrick Wildt: > > > > >> What's holding us up from using the Linux device trees without any > > > > >> changes? This diff I attach inline copies all a64, h3 and h5 related > > > > >> files from v4.12-rc3 (so, mainline) and modifies the emac driver to > > > > >> use the new pinmux attributes. > > > > > > > > > > Andre or someone had already sent a series sync'ing a64 and pine64. > > > > > Can > > > > > you keep h5/h3 separate or rebase onto that series please to not cause > > > > > merge conflicts? Thanks for your work on this. > > > > > > > > Yeah, it's been on u-boot-sunxi/master > > > > > > > > thanks! > > > > > > I had already rebased it against u-boot-sunxi/master, so the attached > > > diff should be fine. Should I send it as a separate [PATCH] mail? > > > > To be clear, you were re-syncing those boards with only changes that > > will be going upstream to the Linux kernel at some point, right? Or are > > already there? And nothing U-Boot specific? > > More the other way around. I replaced the u-boot ones with the files > from linux, so there should be nothing u-boot specific anymore if there > was at all. Is that approach incorrect?
No, that's what I wanted to hear, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
