On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:45:03PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 24/05/17 12:50, Andreas Färber wrote: > > > Hej Patrick, > > > > > > Am 09.05.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Patrick Wildt: > > >> The NanoPi Neo2 is basically the same as the NanoPi Neo, but that they > > >> replaced the SoC with the 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC. Add a (64-bit only) > > >> defconfig defining the required options to build the U-Boot proper. > > >> > > >> Create a new .dts file for it by including the (32-bit) H3 SoC .dtsi > > >> and changing the differing components accordingly, like it's been > > >> done for the OrangePi PC 2. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Patrick Wildt <patr...@blueri.se> > > > > > > I've tested this patch on top of yesterday's master branch > > > (4c78028737c3185f49f5691183aeac3478b5f699 "mksunxi_fit_atf.sh: Allow for > > > this to complete when bl31.bin is missing"). > > > > > > Considering Tom's unanswered question, is there any diff to the upstream > > > kernel .dts? Expected would be to just copy the Linux .dts file here and > > > to state which tree and commit/tag it was taken from. > > I mailed Tom in private asking what to explictly state since 90% was > from u-boot and 10% from Linux-Sunxi (not mainline). I didn't get a > reply, so there was no further mail from me. > > So should I pull it now from v4.12-rc2?
Sorry. I'm trying to help make sure dts changes are on their way to the mainline Linux kernel, so that we don't get out of sync. So, does v4.12-rc2 have everything you need? Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
