Hi Stefan,

2015-10-29 11:02 GMT+01:00 Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> On 29.10.2015 10:54, Dirk Eibach wrote:
>>
>> 2015-10-28 17:39 GMT+01:00 Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>:
>>>
>>> ...  And please note that you can use the
>>> runtime SoC detection for this:
>>>
>>>          if (mvebu_soc_family() == MVEBU_SOC_A38X)
>>>
>>> So no new #idefs are needed in such places.
>>
>>
>> Just give me a quick update please.  Why is runtime detection better?
>> Is it about code coverage? What about binary footprint?
>
>
> We try hard not to add more #idef's to the U-Boot source code
> if possible. This is definitely one of the reasons. Another
> is, that this runtime detection will enable support for
> multiple SoC's in one binary image. This is currently not the
> case, but we should try to work this way if its not too
> hard. And these places for the SoC detection are pretty easy
> to achieve.
>
> The image size will of course be affected. But this drawback is
> outweighed by the pros noted above. At least from my point of
> view.

Ok, that's the information I needed. I will adapt this to runtime detection.

Cheers
Dirk
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to