Hi Anton,
2015-11-17 13:55 GMT+01:00 Anton Schubert <anton.schub...@gmx.de>:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> 2015-10-28 16:44 GMT+01:00 <dirk.eib...@gdsys.cc>:
>>
>> From: Dirk Eibach <dirk.eib...@gdsys.cc>
>>
>> @@ -344,7 +345,6 @@ void pci_init_board(void)
>>
>> /* Don't read at all from pci registers if port power is
>> down */
>> if (pcie->lane == 0 && SELECT(soc_ctrl, pcie->port) == 0)
>> {
>> - i += 3;
>> debug("%s: skipping port %d\n", __func__,
>> pcie->port);
>> continue;
>> }
>
>
> Is there a specific reason why you removed this line or was it just by
> mistake? Because I think doing so would break Armada XP in certain Serdes
> Configurations, as it doesn't like it's PCI registers being read if the port
> is off.
I assume the idea is to go to the next port if the current port is
disabled. But adding 3 to the index does not seem to be the right
thing to do, since Armada XP has ports with 4 lanes, but also with
ports with one lane.
I assume that iterating over all lanes would not be a problem, but by
mistake the pcie->lane == 0 was left in the condition. So this should
perform better:
/* Don't read at all from pci registers if port power is down */
if (SELECT(soc_ctrl, pcie->port) == 0) {
if (pcie->lane == 0)
debug("%s: skipping port %d\n", __func__, pcie->port);
continue;
}
What do you think?
Cheers
Dirk
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
