Hi Fabio, On 24/05/2015 16:27, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > I think the idea is good, thanks. > > I wanted to keep consistency with the mx6cuboxi implementation (which > was based on TI's implementation suggested by Tom during the review of > the mx6cuboxi patches). > > Also, the gpio script idea would work fine for selecting the dtb file, > but not inside checkboard() function, where I print the board revision > name. > > Other aspect I thought is the fact that in case we have another > revision of the board in the future, I think that C code is more > flexible for handling it.
This is a good point, thanks. > > So I like the idea of gpio script, but I would prefer to keep the > current implementation if possible due to the reasons stated above. > ok, clear enough - on my site it is ok to maintain current implementation. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
