Hi Samsung developers, Simon Glass,
2014-09-09 1:10 GMT+09:00 Masahiro YAMADA <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com>: > Hi Stephen, > > > 2014-09-09 0:58 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>: >> On 09/08/2014 09:57 AM, Masahiro YAMADA wrote: >>> >>> Hi Stephen, >>> >>> >>> >>> 2014-09-09 0:04 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>: >>> >>>> I don't believe this is the correct approach; CONFIG_OF_CONTROL isn't a >>>> user-configurable option, and hence shouldn't show up in *_defconfig. >>>> "select OF_CONTROL" in a Kconfig file probably makes sense though. >>> >>> >>> >>> I think it depends on the board (SoC). >>> >>> In my understanding, Zynq boards should work with/without Device Tree >>> control. >>> (Moreover, Zynq boards work with/without SPL) >>> >>> At least as for Zynq, >>> CONFIG_OF_CONTROL ( and CONFIG_SPL too) is a user-configurable option. >>> >>> (Michal, please correct me if I am wrong.) >>> >>> >>> I am not familiar with Tegra SoCs, but >>> do Tegra boards always Device Tree? ( and only work with SPL ?) >>> >>> If so, >>> >>> config TEGRA >>> select SPL >>> select OF_CONTROL >>> >>> looks better? >> >> >> That looks correct for Tegra. >> > > OK. I will send v2. > CONFIG_OF_CONTROL in tegra defconfigs will go away. > > > (BTW, I forgot to mention a famous board; beaglebone black. > > am335_boneblack_defconfig disables CONFIG_OF_CONTROL, > whereas am335_boneblack_vboot_defconfig enables it. ) > Before posting v2 of this series, please let me ask the same question on Exynos and Sandbox Do Exynos boards always need Device Tree to run U-Boot? (that is, CONFIG_OF_CONTROL must be "select"ed.) or Do they work with/without Device Tree? (that is, users can enable/disable via "make menuconfig" or friends.) What about Sandbox? Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
