On 09/08/2014 05:57 PM, Masahiro YAMADA wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> 
> 
> 2014-09-09 0:04 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>:
> 
>> I don't believe this is the correct approach; CONFIG_OF_CONTROL isn't a
>> user-configurable option, and hence shouldn't show up in *_defconfig.
>> "select OF_CONTROL" in a Kconfig file probably makes sense though.
> 
> 
> I think it depends on the board (SoC).
> 
> In my understanding,  Zynq boards should work with/without Device Tree 
> control.
> (Moreover, Zynq boards work with/without  SPL)
> 
> At least as for Zynq,
> CONFIG_OF_CONTROL  ( and CONFIG_SPL too) is a user-configurable option.
> 
> (Michal, please correct me if I am wrong.)

I don't want to restrict people with thing which they want to do that's why
both options are just there.

Thanks,
Michal


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to