On 09/08/2014 05:57 PM, Masahiro YAMADA wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > > > 2014-09-09 0:04 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>: > >> I don't believe this is the correct approach; CONFIG_OF_CONTROL isn't a >> user-configurable option, and hence shouldn't show up in *_defconfig. >> "select OF_CONTROL" in a Kconfig file probably makes sense though. > > > I think it depends on the board (SoC). > > In my understanding, Zynq boards should work with/without Device Tree > control. > (Moreover, Zynq boards work with/without SPL) > > At least as for Zynq, > CONFIG_OF_CONTROL ( and CONFIG_SPL too) is a user-configurable option. > > (Michal, please correct me if I am wrong.)
I don't want to restrict people with thing which they want to do that's why both options are just there. Thanks, Michal
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
