On 09/08/2014 09:57 AM, Masahiro YAMADA wrote:
Hi Stephen,
2014-09-09 0:04 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>:
I don't believe this is the correct approach; CONFIG_OF_CONTROL isn't a
user-configurable option, and hence shouldn't show up in *_defconfig.
"select OF_CONTROL" in a Kconfig file probably makes sense though.
I think it depends on the board (SoC).
In my understanding, Zynq boards should work with/without Device Tree control.
(Moreover, Zynq boards work with/without SPL)
At least as for Zynq,
CONFIG_OF_CONTROL ( and CONFIG_SPL too) is a user-configurable option.
(Michal, please correct me if I am wrong.)
I am not familiar with Tegra SoCs, but
do Tegra boards always Device Tree? ( and only work with SPL ?)
If so,
config TEGRA
select SPL
select OF_CONTROL
looks better?
That looks correct for Tegra.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot