On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Nikita Kiryanov <nik...@compulab.co.il> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > > On 04/03/2014 09:01 AM, Tim Harvey wrote: >> >> This is an attempt at using a macro to allow mx6dl-ddr.h and >> mx6q-ddr.h registers to be used together which is needed for an SPL >> bootloader >> that can run on either CPU's and must configure MMDC iomux dynamically. >> >> I am trying to come up with a solution similar to Eric's approach with the >> similar issue regarding IMX pinmux but this approach is broken in that >> imximage >> will choke on the cfgtmp file due to the fact that the pre-processor won't >> use the enum's as it did the #defines. I'm looking for some positive >> suggestions here or perhaps someone else can come up with a solution for >> this >> particular issue which I haven't been able to resolve. > > > Why can't you just rename the register name #defines without enclosing > them in an anonymous enum? Then they could coexist and will be usable > by imximage. > > -- > Regards, > Nikita.
Nikita, The cfg files are currently all written to use the IOMUX register names as MX6_ (no Q vs DL) so that a single cfg file can be used for a build-time configuration of IMX6Q or IMX6DL. Furthermore, then cfg files use the pre-processor only, which is why the enums I chose don't work for non-SPL. For SPL, I need both sets of #defines (here they could be enums however) so I would have to duplicate all of the #defines in mx6q_pins.h and mx6dl_pins.h to provide both the MX6_ and the MX6Q_/MX6DL_ #defines. I'm ok with submitting that duplication if there is no other way. Am I missing something completely obvious here? Maybe an example of what you are thinking would help me understand. Regards, Tim _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
