Hi Thierry,
On 02/22/2014 01:01 PM, Thierry Bultel wrote:
Le 22/02/2014 20:20, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Thierry,
In message <5308e4d1.5000...@free.fr> you wrote:
The board I am working on, is based on the Freescale sabrelite board,
the manufacturer provides
support for it , as an about 1000 lines patch that applies to
rel_imx_3.0.35_4.1.0
(3.0.35_4.1.0 is the kernel version I am using)
The kernel version is actually totally uninteresting here. What
matters is what U-Boot version you have. Let me guess - it is some
v2009.x - i. e. 5 year old stuff?
Dear Wolfgang,
Sorry for the confusion. I should have been more specific.
What I meant is that my current u-boot version is
tag "rel_imx_3.0.35_4.1.0" from
http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/imx/uboot-imx.git
If I was mentioning the kernel version, it is just to say that switching
to a more recent kernel
version is not an option, because we do not have a device tree BSP for it.
Support for SABRE Lite is in the main-line kernel as well, but that's
a completely separate topic.
So what would be the easiest and time less costing option to achieve
what I want to do ?
It is best to take current code (top of tree in git repository) and
port it to your hardware from scratch. You can use your old code as
reference, for example how to set up pin muxing and such. Otherwise
it is pretty much worthless.
>
If the sabrelite board would still be supported in master, it would be
straightforward.
So I am thinking about re-bringing support for sabrelite my branch, first.
It **is** still in master. It just uses board/boundary/nitrogen6x.c
as the implementation.
It doesn't look anything like the 2009.08 code base, because, as
Wolfgang said, that's very old.
Regards,
Eric
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
