On Thursday 19 December 2013 02:50 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Sourav Poddar<sourav.pod...@ti.com> wrote:
On Thursday 19 December 2013 02:21 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Sourav Poddar<sourav.pod...@ti.com>
wrote:
On Thursday 19 December 2013 12:49 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sourav Poddar<sourav.pod...@ti.com>
wrote:
On Thursday 19 December 2013 12:24 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Sourav Poddar<sourav.pod...@ti.com>
wrote:
Hi Jagan,
On Thursday 14 November 2013 09:09 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
The patch series add support for enabling qspi
on AM43xx at uboot.
Testing done:
-------------
Wrote a uImage to the flash, read it back and boot the
kernel.
Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki (1):
sf: macronix: Add support for MX25L51235F
Sourav Poddar (4):
am43xx: add qspi support
am437x_epos_evm: add SPL API, QSPI, and serial flash support
qspi/spi: Add AM43xx specifics changes
am43xx: add delay before xfer
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/clock_am43xx.c | 1 +
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/cpu.h | 4 +++-
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/omap.h | 1 +
board/ti/am43xx/mux.c | 11 +++++++++++
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c | 2 ++
drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c | 29
++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
include/configs/am43xx_evm.h | 20
++++++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
If these patches seems fine to you, can these be picked?
Please send the next version patches - fix the comments as we
discussed
so
far.
I will send the next version.
But, what about the delay patch, I tried other stuffs but could not see
any
thing
that helps.
So, I will send the delay patch also as of now, to make it work out of
mainline.
I am some how OK with that as that change is in ur driver..
Just try this change
/* FIXME: comments here... */
+#ifdef CONFIG_AM43XX
+ udelay(100);
+#endif
And also write the bug log on commit message(means with out delay)
Try to ass the testing logs on doc/ - for each time you tested a new
flash or new driver.
Jagan,
Just realised that this patches depends on AM43x base patches which are
in
ti-uboot mainline tree. So, what should I do in that case. ?
Send all of them together..!
So, I should send all the base patches also?
am43xx_evm is already available - all patches means related to spi for
this board.
If OK then send
Note: These dependendt patches are already there in tom ti-uboot mainline
tree.
I am getting this error while building with this patches
drivers/spi/built-in.o: In function `spi_setup_slave':
/home/a0131647/clone/u-boot/drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c:180: undefined
reference to `gpio_request'
/home/a0131647/clone/u-boot/drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c:181: undefined
reference to `gpio_direction_output'
arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: BFD (crosstool-NG
linaro-1.13.1-4.7-2013.03-20130313 - Linaro GCC 2013.03) 2.23.1
assertion fail
/cbuild/slaves/oorts/crosstool-ng/builds/arm-linux-gnueabihf-linux/.build/src/binutils-2.23.1/bfd/elf32-arm.c:7677
arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: BFD (crosstool-NG
linaro-1.13.1-4.7-2013.03-20130313 - Linaro GCC 2013.03) 2.23.1
assertion fail
/cbuild/slaves/oorts/crosstool-ng/builds/arm-linux-gnueabihf-linux/.build/src/binutils-2.23.1/bfd/elf32-arm.c:7677
arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: error: required section '.rel.plt' not found
in the linker script
arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: final link failed: Invalid operation
I think there is something else that need to be merged from ti-uboot
tree as I am not facing this
issue there
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
