On Thursday 19 December 2013 02:21 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Sourav Poddar<sourav.pod...@ti.com>  wrote:
On Thursday 19 December 2013 12:49 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sourav Poddar<sourav.pod...@ti.com>
wrote:
On Thursday 19 December 2013 12:24 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Sourav Poddar<sourav.pod...@ti.com>
wrote:
Hi Jagan,

On Thursday 14 November 2013 09:09 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
The patch series add support for enabling qspi
on AM43xx at uboot.

Testing done:
-------------
Wrote a uImage to the flash, read it back and boot the
kernel.

Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki (1):
      sf: macronix: Add support for MX25L51235F

Sourav Poddar (4):
      am43xx: add qspi support
      am437x_epos_evm: add SPL API, QSPI, and serial flash support
      qspi/spi: Add AM43xx specifics changes
      am43xx: add delay before xfer

     arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/clock_am43xx.c |    1 +
     arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/cpu.h   |    4 +++-
     arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/omap.h  |    1 +
     board/ti/am43xx/mux.c                    |   11 +++++++++++
     drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c               |    2 ++
     drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c                    |   29
++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
     include/configs/am43xx_evm.h             |   20
++++++++++++++++++++
     7 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

If these patches seems fine to you, can these be picked?
Please send the next version patches - fix the comments as we discussed
so
far.

I will send the next version.
But, what about the delay patch, I tried other stuffs but could not see
any
thing
that helps.
So,  I will send the delay patch also as of now, to make it work out of
mainline.
I am some how OK with that as that change is in ur driver..

Just try this change
/* FIXME: comments here... */
+#ifdef CONFIG_AM43XX
+ udelay(100);
+#endif

And also write the bug log on commit message(means with out delay)

Try to ass the testing logs on doc/ - for each time you tested a new
flash or new driver.

Jagan,

Just realised that this patches depends on AM43x base patches which are in
ti-uboot mainline tree. So, what should I do in that case. ?
Send all of them together..!

So, I should send all the base patches also?
Note: These dependendt patches are already there in tom ti-uboot mainline tree.


_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to