On Thursday 19 December 2013 02:50 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Sourav Poddar<sourav.pod...@ti.com> wrote:
On Thursday 19 December 2013 02:21 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Sourav Poddar<sourav.pod...@ti.com>
wrote:
On Thursday 19 December 2013 12:49 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sourav Poddar<sourav.pod...@ti.com>
wrote:
On Thursday 19 December 2013 12:24 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Sourav Poddar<sourav.pod...@ti.com>
wrote:
Hi Jagan,
On Thursday 14 November 2013 09:09 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
The patch series add support for enabling qspi
on AM43xx at uboot.
Testing done:
-------------
Wrote a uImage to the flash, read it back and boot the
kernel.
Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki (1):
sf: macronix: Add support for MX25L51235F
Sourav Poddar (4):
am43xx: add qspi support
am437x_epos_evm: add SPL API, QSPI, and serial flash support
qspi/spi: Add AM43xx specifics changes
am43xx: add delay before xfer
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/clock_am43xx.c | 1 +
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/cpu.h | 4 +++-
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/omap.h | 1 +
board/ti/am43xx/mux.c | 11 +++++++++++
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c | 2 ++
drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c | 29
++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
include/configs/am43xx_evm.h | 20
++++++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
If these patches seems fine to you, can these be picked?
Please send the next version patches - fix the comments as we
discussed
so
far.
I will send the next version.
But, what about the delay patch, I tried other stuffs but could not see
any
thing
that helps.
So, I will send the delay patch also as of now, to make it work out of
mainline.
I am some how OK with that as that change is in ur driver..
Just try this change
/* FIXME: comments here... */
+#ifdef CONFIG_AM43XX
+ udelay(100);
+#endif
And also write the bug log on commit message(means with out delay)
Try to ass the testing logs on doc/ - for each time you tested a new
flash or new driver.
Jagan,
Just realised that this patches depends on AM43x base patches which are
in
ti-uboot mainline tree. So, what should I do in that case. ?
Send all of them together..!
So, I should send all the base patches also?
am43xx_evm is already available - all patches means related to spi for
this board.
If OK then send
Ok. Actually bassic board support is already there. But there were few
updated done on baseport side to make these reach uboot prompt. I will
test with those patches and send you only the spi part for pull bsed on
your master branch.
Note: These dependendt patches are already there in tom ti-uboot mainline
tree.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
