Also, is it not long-term, post Dave/Jay, planning by ABC?
Establish Kimmel at 11.35, presumably get a good percentage of the younger viewers, and have a realistic chance of being number 1 in late night following the sooner-than-later transitions at CBS and NBC. On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:55:32 PM UTC+1, David Bruggeman wrote: > > So is it possible that ABC could lose eyeballs in the 11:35-12:05 slot but > gain revenue, due to differences in ad rates? I'm inferring as much from > the piece. > > I think this also marks the first mention I've seen where Fallon is > mentioned as a replacement for Leno. Sure, it's highly speculative, but > worth noting all the same. > > David > > ------------------------------ > *From:* David Lynch <[email protected] <javascript:>> > *Subject:* [TV orNotTV] NYT: Kimmel to 11:35, Nightline to 12:35 > > Starting in March, Nightline gets an hour of Friday night prime time > to make up for the demotion in time slot. > > > http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/21/jimmy-kimmel-to-move-to-1130-in-january-abc-announces/ > > -- > David J. Lynch > [email protected] <javascript:> > > > -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
