2014-06-12 12:38 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: > On 12 Jun 12:29, Mathias Behrle wrote: >> * Cédric Krier: " Re: [tryton-dev] What should be the search on: 1..42" (Thu, >> 12 Jun 2014 12:11:13 +0200): >> >> > On 12 Jun 11:59, Mathias Behrle wrote: >> > > * Cédric Krier: " [tryton-dev] What should be the search on: 1..42" >> > > (Thu, 12 >> > > Jun 2014 11:06:34 +0200): >> > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > We get some astonishement with the current behavior of the client with >> > > > the range search syntax. >> > > > >> > > > Currently: `Field: 1..42` will become >> > > > >> > > > `[('field', '>=', 1), ('field', '<', 42)]` >> > > > >> > > > But it seems people expect: >> > > > >> > > > `[('field', '>=', 1), ('field', '<=', 42)]` >> > > > >> > > > One point about the current behavior is that you can slide the range by >> > > > the length and it will not contain any duplication. >> > > > >> > > > So what do you think? >> > > >> > > From a user perspective the search imitates 'from 1 to 42', which >> > > includes >> > > 42 in the selection. >> > >> > What is the original of 'from 1 to 42'? >> >> Sorry, I don't understand the question. > > You say that the search imitates something which has a specific > behavior. But where does it come from?
I think it comes from these two facts: - When speaking, we always say "values between 1 and 42" and in this case everybody understands that both numbers are included. - It's easier to search. For example if you search all account moves of march, you think of the first to 31th of march. Using "<" and ">" means the user has to think of 28th february and 1st of april. > > > -- > Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL > Email/Jabber: [email protected] > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- Albert Cervera i Areny Tel. 93 553 18 03 @albertnan www.NaN-tic.com
