2014-06-12 11:06 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > We get some astonishement with the current behavior of the client with > the range search syntax. > > Currently: `Field: 1..42` will become > > `[('field', '>=', 1), ('field', '<', 42)]` > > But it seems people expect: > > `[('field', '>=', 1), ('field', '<=', 42)]` > > One point about the current behavior is that you can slide the range by > the length and it will not contain any duplication. > > So what do you think?
I can confirm that the search is not as users expect in our experience. -- Albert Cervera i Areny Tel. 93 553 18 03 @albertnan www.NaN-tic.com
