On 04/21/2015 01:26 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > Den 2015-04-21 20:21, Israel skrev: >> On 04/21/2015 01:13 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote: >>> Den 2015-04-21 18:41, Israel skrev: >>>> On 04/21/2015 09:03 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote: >>>>> Den 2015-04-21 04:07, Israel skrev: >>>>>>>> .. >>>>> ... >> Hi Nio, >> can we not write to the Windows partition? I don't fully understand why >> we would *not* want to write to it. If it is a separate /dev/sdX it >> should be fine to write to, but we cannot write to the /dev/sdX we are >> copying. That is the only real limitation I see. But if you have >> really good reasoning that I am missing (I dislike using windows... so I >> rarely ever do it unless I have to update BIOS or defrag, etc..) > > Hi again, > > In installer mode, yes we are happy to write to a Windows partition > (overwriting Windows). But in tarball making mode, I don't think we find > a suitable system source unless there is a linux filesystem. > > Best regards > Nio Hi Nio, Oh, I see for the source.. I was thinking along the lines of destination... I am still thinking about giving the users the ability to mount drives from zmktbl like we had talked about earlier in the 'lsblker' process :) Yes you should hide it, but if we do end up adding a mount option, if you give something like:
while test $# -ne 0 do case $1 in write-mounter) # display windows ;; read-mounter) # hide windows ;; esac done This way if you or I decide to add the mounting ability we don't have to recode... it will be there already. -- Regards -Israel ToriOS Team -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~torios Post to : torios@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~torios More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp