Den 2015-04-21 20:44, Israel skrev: > On 04/21/2015 01:26 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote: >> Den 2015-04-21 20:21, Israel skrev: >>> On 04/21/2015 01:13 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote: >>>> Den 2015-04-21 18:41, Israel skrev: >>>>> On 04/21/2015 09:03 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote: >>>>>> Den 2015-04-21 04:07, Israel skrev: >>>>>>>>> .. >>>>>> ... >>> Hi Nio, >>> can we not write to the Windows partition? I don't fully understand why >>> we would *not* want to write to it. If it is a separate /dev/sdX it >>> should be fine to write to, but we cannot write to the /dev/sdX we are >>> copying. That is the only real limitation I see. But if you have >>> really good reasoning that I am missing (I dislike using windows... so I >>> rarely ever do it unless I have to update BIOS or defrag, etc..) >> >> Hi again, >> >> In installer mode, yes we are happy to write to a Windows partition >> (overwriting Windows). But in tarball making mode, I don't think we find >> a suitable system source unless there is a linux filesystem. >> >> Best regards >> Nio > Hi Nio, > Oh, I see for the source.. > I was thinking along the lines of destination... > I am still thinking about giving the users the ability to mount drives > from zmktbl like we had talked about earlier in the 'lsblker' process :) > Yes you should hide it, but if we do end up adding a mount option, if > you give something like: > > while test $# -ne 0 > do > case $1 in > write-mounter) > # display windows > ;; > read-mounter) > # hide windows > ;; > esac > done > > This way if you or I decide to add the mounting ability we don't have to > recode... it will be there already. >
Hi again, Yes, I remember, and I see the benefit of that. Best regards Nio -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~torios Post to : torios@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~torios More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
