On 3/28/19, dns1...@riseup.net <dns1...@riseup.net> wrote: > I think you are affected by cognitive bias.
Tor is effected by lack of external thought. > You are blindly looking only for bad things. Your adversaries are assuredly looking at those things and more. If you are not looking at them, you're done in mate. > Of course the network is not perfect, but is the best we have That's apologist talk to avoid clean slate researching and creating better architectures, even to the then at that point possibly legit point of being able to actually make that declaration. > and we should make our best to improve it. Tor is and will always be 20 year old architecture from time before current adversary models were say matured if not known. Tor's relatively simple and effectively static with only marginal improvements left. And has outright traded off and/or discarded design models that others might not today. (And obviously Tor arch cannot be substantially changed while still calling itself Tor.) Before declaring Tor sufficient against today threats you need to analyse it against today threats vs new networks being research and deploy against today threats. > trying to delegitimate everything. Those concerned with messengers vs messages are prone to miss some dead canaries. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
