On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 4:32 PM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> > Hiya, > > On 16/04/2025 00:02, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > > > I can see a case being made that this draft does improve the > deployability of > > TLS if we start with a baseline of draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem and note > that > > that mechanism is not deployable in some environments (I guess, ones > with some > > kind of strict FIPS-only requirement, though I'm not conversant in the > details > > of such an environment). > > A question (not necessarily for Ben): Are there any concrete/specific > environments that we know about that will need non-hybrid PQ KEMs for > reasons other than national regulatory reasons? > Hey, I'm just working for Acme Logistics, a small consulting company. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
