Hi! It looks like we have consensus to adopt this draft as a working group 
item.  Couple of things to note:

1. Authors, please submit the draft named as: draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem
2. Authors, please make no changes other than the boilerplate, e.g., name, 
dates to the -00 WG version
3. WG: We will continue on with the other WG adoption calls as discussed on 
list and at IETF 122.

Cheers,
spt

> On Mar 10, 2025, at 9:58 PM, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
> Just a quick reminder that this adoption call is still ongoing.
> 
> spt
> 
>> On Feb 28, 2025, at 1:56 PM, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote:
>> 
>> In response to the WG adoption call, Dan Bernstein pointed out some 
>> potential IPR (see [0]), but no IPR disclosure has been made in accordance 
>> with BCP 79.  Additional information is provided here; see [1].
>> 
>> BCP 79 makes this important point:
>> 
>> (b) The IETF, following normal processes, can decide to use
>>   technology for which IPR disclosures have been made if it decides
>>   that such a use is warranted.
>> 
>> WG members can take this information into account during this adoption call 
>> to determine if we should adopt these drafts. If this information changes a 
>> view that you have already expressed during this WG adoption call, please 
>> post a follow-up message. We also extend the WG adoption call to 14 March 
>> 2025.
>> 
>> Reminder:  This call for adoption has nothing to do with picking the 
>> mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS.
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Joe and Sean
>> 
>> [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/mt4_p95NZv8duZIJvJPdZV90-ZU/
>> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/GKFhHfBeCgf8hQQvhUcyOJ6M-kI/
>> 
>>> On Feb 26, 2025, at 1:26 PM, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> At IETF 121, the WG discussed “Post-Quantum Hybrid ECDHE-MLKEM Key 
>>> Agreement for TLSv1.3”; see [0] and [1]. We also had some discussion in an 
>>> information gathering thread; see [2]. We would like to now determine 
>>> whether there is support to adopt this I-D. If you support adoption and are 
>>> willing to review and contribute text, please send a message to the list. 
>>> If you do not support adoption of this I-D, please send a message to the 
>>> list and indicate why. This WG adoption call will close at 2359 UTC on 12 
>>> March 2025.
>>> 
>>> One special note: this adoption call has nothing to do with picking the 
>>> mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sean & Joe
>>> 
>>> [0] Link to I-D: 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem/
>>> [1] Link to slides: 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/121/materials/slides-121-tls-post-quantum-hybrid-ecdhe-mlkem-key-agreement-for-tlsv13-00
>>> [2] Link to information gather thread: 
>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/yGZV5dBTcxHJhG-JtfaP6beTd68/
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to