Perfect! Thanks Sean. We will come back to chairs shortly. - Kris
On March 20, 2025 5:01:31 PM GMT+07:00, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: >Hi! It looks like we have consensus to adopt this draft as a working group >item. Couple of things to note: > >1. Authors, please submit the draft named as: draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem >2. Authors, please make no changes other than the boilerplate, e.g., name, >dates to the -00 WG version >3. WG: We will continue on with the other WG adoption calls as discussed on >list and at IETF 122. > >Cheers, >spt > >> On Mar 10, 2025, at 9:58 PM, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: >> >> Just a quick reminder that this adoption call is still ongoing. >> >> spt >> >>> On Feb 28, 2025, at 1:56 PM, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: >>> >>> In response to the WG adoption call, Dan Bernstein pointed out some >>> potential IPR (see [0]), but no IPR disclosure has been made in accordance >>> with BCP 79. Additional information is provided here; see [1]. >>> >>> BCP 79 makes this important point: >>> >>> (b) The IETF, following normal processes, can decide to use >>> technology for which IPR disclosures have been made if it decides >>> that such a use is warranted. >>> >>> WG members can take this information into account during this adoption call >>> to determine if we should adopt these drafts. If this information changes a >>> view that you have already expressed during this WG adoption call, please >>> post a follow-up message. We also extend the WG adoption call to 14 March >>> 2025. >>> >>> Reminder: This call for adoption has nothing to do with picking the >>> mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS. >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Joe and Sean >>> >>> [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/mt4_p95NZv8duZIJvJPdZV90-ZU/ >>> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/GKFhHfBeCgf8hQQvhUcyOJ6M-kI/ >>> >>>> On Feb 26, 2025, at 1:26 PM, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> At IETF 121, the WG discussed “Post-Quantum Hybrid ECDHE-MLKEM Key >>>> Agreement for TLSv1.3”; see [0] and [1]. We also had some discussion in an >>>> information gathering thread; see [2]. We would like to now determine >>>> whether there is support to adopt this I-D. If you support adoption and >>>> are willing to review and contribute text, please send a message to the >>>> list. If you do not support adoption of this I-D, please send a message to >>>> the list and indicate why. This WG adoption call will close at 2359 UTC on >>>> 12 March 2025. >>>> >>>> One special note: this adoption call has nothing to do with picking the >>>> mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Sean & Joe >>>> >>>> [0] Link to I-D: >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem/ >>>> [1] Link to slides: >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/121/materials/slides-121-tls-post-quantum-hybrid-ecdhe-mlkem-key-agreement-for-tlsv13-00 >>>> [2] Link to information gather thread: >>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/yGZV5dBTcxHJhG-JtfaP6beTd68/ >>> >> > >_______________________________________________ >TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org >To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
