Hiya,
On 28/02/2025 18:56, Sean Turner wrote:
In response to the WG adoption call, Dan Bernstein pointed out some potential IPR (see [0]), but no IPR disclosure has been made in accordance with BCP 79.
While I don't think the lack of an IPR declaration is fatal here, I do think it'd be great if that uncertainty could be reduced. I think I saw that Russ tried to reach out to one of the possible patent holders to ask if they'd be willing to make a declaration. I've no idea where that's at, but I'd encourage the TLS chairs and SEC ADs to see if they can help get that to happen as reducing uncertainty would be good and if we can't, then this topic will just keep cropping up and Dan is not the only person I've heard express concerns in this regard. Cheers, S. PS: I do realise we can't force someone to make an IPR declaration.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
