Hi TLS co-chairs, I support adoption.
Regards, Quynh. On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 12:09 AM Loganaden Velvindron <logana...@gmail.com> wrote: > I share the same view as Martin. I also support adoption but we should > be very careful proceeding forward. > > On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 05:00, Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote: > > > > Like other pure ML-KEM uses, I am OK with adoption, though I might > oppose Recommended: Y when it comes to that. I also share John's concerns > about key reuse, but would prefer to litigate that in the working group, > rather than during adoption. > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, at 23:58, Sean Turner wrote: > > > We are continuing with our pre-announced tranche of WG adoption calls; > > > see [0] for more information. This time we are issuing a WG adoption > > > call for the ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3 I-D [1]. If > > > you support adoption and are willing to review and contribute text, > > > please send a message to the list. If you do not support adoption of > > > this draft, please send a message to the list and indicate why. This > > > call will close at 2359 UTC on 15 April 2025. > > > > > > In response to other WG adoption calls, Dan Bernstein pointed out some > > > potential IPR (see [2]), but no IPR disclosure has been made in > > > accordance with BCP 79. Additional information is provided here; see > > > [3]. > > > > > > BCP 79 makes this important point: > > > > > > (b) The IETF, following normal processes, can decide to use > > > technology for which IPR disclosures have been made if it decides > > > that such a use is warranted. > > > > > > WG members can take this information into account during this adoption > > > call to determine if we should adopt these drafts. > > > > > > Reminder: This call for adoption has nothing to do with picking the > > > mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Joe and Sean > > > > > > [0] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KMOTm_lE5OIAKG8_chDlRKuav7c/ > > > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement/ > > > [2] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/mt4_p95NZv8duZIJvJPdZV90-ZU/ > > > [3] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/GKFhHfBeCgf8hQQvhUcyOJ6M-kI/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > > > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
