2025-04-02 17:39 GMT+02:00 Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com>:
> Opposing adoption to force the document to be published in a way that can't
> be "Recommended: Y" feels like (unnecessarily) meta-gaming the IETF process.
>
> I am not aware of any of those opposed who are doing it for this reason.
> Perhaps speculating on their reasons isn’t a good thing to do?
I interpreted at least one opposing statement in the sibling thread as
expressing a preference for the ISE for this reason, but I chose to address the
concern (Recommended Y or N) and not the individuals.
If I misinterpreted, then great: my argument is a non-sequitur that applies to
no one.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
