Moreover, it means that someone who is not available at the time of the meeting for whatever reason even if it’s not money (for example, they have a conflict with another wg) is now excluded. There is a good reason why we do consensus on mailing lists. If participants are engaging in dos attacks you can always ask on the mailing list for the equivalent of a hum, just as we do in meetings.
Op wo 15 jan 2025 om 05:00 schreef Peter Gutmann <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz> > Dang, Quynh H. (Fed) <quynh.dang=40nist....@dmarc.ietf.org> writes: > > >Maybe consensus calls can only be made and completed at the in-person > >meetings ? > > Ugh, that would make the existing situation where a lot of important > decisions > are made at in-person meetings and then presented as a fait accomplis to > the > list even worse, only big players who can afford to stack the room would > get > to have any say. > > Peter. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
