+1. There are people that want to implement both hybrid and pure key exchange. This action would allow a path to RECOMMENDED = Y for both in the future.
Russ > On Dec 16, 2024, at 5:21 PM, Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, at 08:59, Sean Turner wrote: >> Is the WG consensus to run four separate adoption calls for the >> individual I-Ds in question? > > I would like to see adoption calls for the key exchange modes and not the > signature modes. The key exchange documents are both more ready and more > urgent. > > The question of whether to set Recommended = Y for any particular choice is > separable and can wait. Keep things as Recommended = N for now.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
