To answer Joe's question, yes I support 4 separate adoption calls
for the I-Ds in question.
On 12/16/24 2:21 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, at 08:59, Sean Turner wrote:
Is the WG consensus to run four separate adoption calls for the
individual I-Ds in question?
I would like to see adoption calls for the key exchange modes and not the
signature modes. The key exchange documents are both more ready and more
urgent.
I agree that the key exchange modes are more urgent. That said, I would
support adoption of this one:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement/
and will advocate for it being "recommended = Y". regards,
Dan.
--
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
