If there are some patent concerns regarding ML-KEM going forward, Would considering NTRU-Prime as a less risky option for TLS Kex?
(Please see this thread: https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/patent-license-for-kyber/128114) There is a section about patents here: https://ntruprime.cr.yp.to/warnings.html On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 02:53, Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I only support an adoption call for this one: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem/ > > The other ones seem like they could wait, carefully noting that postponement > is not a "no" vote. > > thanks, > Rob > > > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 2:21 PM Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, at 08:59, Sean Turner wrote: >> > Is the WG consensus to run four separate adoption calls for the >> > individual I-Ds in question? >> >> I would like to see adoption calls for the key exchange modes and not the >> signature modes. The key exchange documents are both more ready and more >> urgent. >> >> The question of whether to set Recommended = Y for any particular choice is >> separable and can wait. Keep things as Recommended = N for now. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
