Hi, I only support an adoption call for this one:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem/ The other ones seem like they could wait, carefully noting that postponement is not a "no" vote. thanks, Rob On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 2:21 PM Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, at 08:59, Sean Turner wrote: > > Is the WG consensus to run four separate adoption calls for the > > individual I-Ds in question? > > I would like to see adoption calls for the key exchange modes and not the > signature modes. The key exchange documents are both more ready and more > urgent. > > The question of whether to set Recommended = Y for any particular choice > is separable and can wait. Keep things as Recommended = N for now. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
