+1 for adoption
Dan.
On 12/12/24 2:06 PM, Filippo Valsorda wrote:
2024-12-07 18:36 GMT+01:00 Watson Ladd <watsonbl...@gmail.com>:
Having MLKEM without a hybrid as an option in TLS when the
interoperable choice is a hybrid is not going to exclude people.
Furthermore we didn't hybridize x25519 and RSA. It's clear some
people believe ML-KEM is secure enough for their uses.
Agreed on both counts, +1 to adoption.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list --tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email totls-le...@ietf.org
--
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
