2024-12-07 18:36 GMT+01:00 Watson Ladd <watsonbl...@gmail.com>:
> Having MLKEM without a hybrid as an option in TLS when the interoperable 
> choice is a hybrid is not going to exclude people.
> 
> Furthermore we didn't hybridize x25519 and RSA. It's clear some people 
> believe ML-KEM is secure enough for their uses.

Agreed on both counts, +1 to adoption.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to