2024-12-07 18:36 GMT+01:00 Watson Ladd <watsonbl...@gmail.com>: > Having MLKEM without a hybrid as an option in TLS when the interoperable > choice is a hybrid is not going to exclude people. > > Furthermore we didn't hybridize x25519 and RSA. It's clear some people > believe ML-KEM is secure enough for their uses.
Agreed on both counts, +1 to adoption.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org