Andrew Campling <andrew.campl...@419.cons <mailto:andrew.campl...@419.cons>ulting> writes: >it should be possible to communicate clearly to implementers and others the >relative positions of TLS 1.2, TLS-LTS and TLS 1.3 with reference RFC 9325 >and any other relevant documents etc.
On 11/25/24, 6:47 AM, "Peter Gutmann" <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz <mailto:pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz>> wrote: > Makes sense, I'd have no problems doing that, although as mentioned for RFC > 9325 I'd prefer to reference it as "further advice" to avoid confusion over > the fact that a lot of it covers things that don't exist in -LTS. I'm open to > suggestions on how to handle this, maybe it's nothing to be concerned about. I'd be willing to provide some rough/initial text if it would help this get adopted. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
