If the consensus view of the working group is that the existing communications have resulted in mixed messages and some confusion, the adoption of TLS LTS could provide a useful vehicle to address that whilst also dealing with the various technical points that Peter has already identified in his draft. By expanding the introduction plus sections 3.7 and 4 (or by adding a new section), it should be possible to communicate clearly to implementers and others the relative positions of TLS 1.2, TLS-LTS and TLS 1.3 with reference RFC 9325 and any other relevant documents etc.
This makes sense to me.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
